I. Requirements analysis and system planning
The core question: How to avoid mismatched systems due to selection errors?
A: Need to clarify the control object process and performance indicators. First of all, analyse the size of the equipment (stand-alone / production line), I / O points (reserved 10%-20% margin) and special needs (such as PID control, communication protocols). For example:
- small system(<128 points): Logic control is the main focus, select S7-200 and other basic PLCs
- Medium-sized systems(128-512 points): analogue processing required, S7-300 with expansion module optional
- major system(>512 points): redundancy and high-speed communication required, select S7-400 or equivalent.
Key actions: Draw process flow diagrams, labelling control nodes and safety interlocking points.
II. Hardware Selection and Configuration
The central question: How can modules be paired to balance cost and reliability?
A: Follow the principle of "functionality can be utilised, expansion is reserved":
- input moduleSelection by sensor type (switching/analogue), isolation of high voltage signals to prevent interference
- output module: Relay output to drive contactors, transistor output to control high-frequency loads
- Special modulesMotion control with pulse module, high temperature with special temperature module.
Guide to avoiding the pit: The power module needs to be grounded independently, and the 220V and 24V lines are wired in separate slots.
III. I/O Distribution and Electrical Design
Core issue: what to do if the address is messed up and causes debugging to fail?
A. Adoptionpartition coding::
- Partitioning by device: e.g. conveyor belt = I0.0~I0.7, manipulator = Q1.0~Q1.5
- Grouping by Function: Uniform I9.X for emergency stop signals and Q8.X for alarm lights.
- Making an I/O table: Label terminal number, signal type, corresponding equipment
Circuit Design Points: Separation of the main circuit from the PLC control circuit, strong power plus fuse protection.
IV. Control programme design
Core question: How can I improve the readability and maintainability of my programmes?
A: Structured programming + three-part architecture:
plaintextmake a copy ofInitialisation → Device status detection → Safety interlock judgement ↓ manual mode → single action test → automatic process ↓ troubleshooting → data logging
Key Tips::
- Uniform naming of timers/counters (e.g. T_Conveyor_Delay)
- Adding comment lines to complex logic
V. Simulation debugging and optimisation
Core question: how do I verify the correctness of the logic without being online?
Answer.Four-step simulation method::
- Forced I/O Test: Trigger an input point manually and observe the output response
- Segmented END debugging: Insert the END instruction at the end of the program segment and check it out segment by segment.
- Simulation software validation: Testing motion trajectories as in TIA Portal simulator
- idle operation: Disconnect power to the actuator and test the logic flow within the PLC
PID parameter adjustment: Proportional (P) then Integral (I) and finally Differential (D).
Sixth, online debugging and functional testing
Core problem: How to solve the signal false triggering caused by field interference?
Answer.three-tier anti-jamming strategy::
level initiative case (law) hardware layer Analogue signal plus magnetic ring Temperature Sensor Shielded Wire Twisted software layer Set digital filtering (>10ms) Eliminate Button Jitter machine level Dual redundancy checking of key signals Emergency stop signal parallel normally closed contact
Mandatory Safety Tests::
- Emergency stop button cuts off all outputs within 0.5 seconds
- Simulate a disconnection fault and verify that the safety status value is active
VII. Delivery and ongoing maintenance
The central question: How can we reduce the cost of post-maintenance?
A. EstablishmentThree sets of technical assets::
- backup file: Final version of the programme + list of hardware configurations
- fault tree diagram: Common alarm codes and processing paths (e.g. E01 = sensor disconnection)
- list of items for inspection: Monthly calibration of I/O module supply voltage (within ±10% fluctuation)
Experience Tips: First run 72 hours full load test, recording temperature rise and anomaly logs.
The success of the PLC control system lies in balancing the gap between design and practice - one more redundancy in selection, one more layer of protection in programming, and one more extreme test in debugging, so that the "seven-step process" can be transformed into a never-compromise precision beat on the production line.